Delayed gratification is not 2.0?

We’re all very 2.0 these days - Library 2.0, Knowledge Worker 2.0, Government 2.0.

I face the “a pleasure delayed is a pleasure doubled” vs. “hair-trigger nerd instant gratification syndrome” frustration this morning. The budding blogwar with Anne Zelenka over her comments on Peter Drucker has lost a little steam now that she’s blocked further comments on the post, Technorati is down so I can’t check my overnight figures, and the wireless LAN at home is acting up.

So… is delayed gratification a part of modern nerd life or not? Single point of focus activities like coding imply a certain tradeoff between effort and result, an understanding of “give some now, get more later”. For myself, I work for a living, am happy to trade my time for cash - but I do want interesting and fulfilling work (which I get in spades at SMSMT). This implies a certain need for instant gratification - I want the work to be interesting now. Curious.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed or add it to
Del.icio.us | Digg | Technorati | reddit


2 Responses to “Delayed gratification is not 2.0?”


  1. 1 yamaplos

    I wrote a bit on “delayed gratification” also
    http://yamaplos.blogspot.com/

  2. 2 AndrewBoyd

    Hi Yama,

    thank you for your comment. It took a little while to get approved, sorry, I have Akismet put first-time commenters into the moderation queue as the last defence against spam :)

    It is an interesting comparison that you make about delayed gratification and children - the normal pattern of events is that we learn the delayed gratification payoff as we grow older. My question was, I suppose, had I learned it yet? :)

    Best regards, Andrew

Leave a Reply